7 results for 'nos:"Railway Labor Act - Labor"'.
J. O'Connor denies, in part, a pilots' union's motion to dismiss a female pilot's discrimination action. She sufficient pleads her claims for sex discrimination and retaliation.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: O'Connor, Filed On: February 14, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv851, NOS: Railway Labor Act - Labor, Categories: Employment Discrimination, Employment Retaliation, Labor / Unions
J. Chen dismisses class employment claims against United Airlines and a workers' union from employees who say the union and the airline conspired together to hash out a deal that reduced employee wages. The employees have not offered up meaningful proof of any "secret conspiracy" that resulted in reduced wages. The class of employees are given an opportunity to amend in the event they can point to a specific part of their contract the union or the company tried to subvert.
Court: USDC Northern District of California, Judge: Chen, Filed On: February 7, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv3939, NOS: Railway Labor Act - Labor, Categories: Employment, Labor / Unions
J. Sargus denies the pilots' union's motion for a preliminary injunction, ruling that while emails sent by the private jet company's corporate officers to discourage certain union activity were "strong critiques" of the union and its bargaining positions, they did not rise to the level anti-union animus required to invoke this court's jurisdiction, while the company's willingness to continue negotiations on a bargaining agreement require dismissal of the union's claims.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Sargus, Filed On: January 5, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv1404, NOS: Railway Labor Act - Labor, Categories: Jurisdiction, Labor / Unions, Injunction
J. Land partially rules in favor of the employer in the employee's action alleging retaliation in violation of the Federal Railroad Safety Act. The employee claimed he was suspended and fired for reporting on-the-job injuries, filing personal injury claims under the Federal Employer's Liability Act, reporting locomotive issues and complying with the hours-of-service law which resulted in delays. The employer's motion for summary judgment is granted as to the claim arising after the employee reported work-related injuries. The employee failed to show that the injury reports contributed to the unfavorable personnel actions. However, the employer's motion is denied as to the claims based on reporting locomotive problems and complying with hours-of-service requirements. The employee presented evidence which could contradict the employer's stated reason for his removal from service and termination.
Court: USDC Middle District of Georgia, Judge: Land, Filed On: November 7, 2023, Case #: 4:22cv117, NOS: Railway Labor Act - Labor, Categories: Employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Starr sanctions Southwest for rewording a court-ordered release to its flight attendants, in which it said “’Southwest does not discriminate against [e]mployees for their religious practices and beliefs,’” which improperly made it sound as though the district court was “bequeathing Southwest a badge of honor for not discriminating.” Three Southwest attorneys are ordered to attend religious-liberty training and Southwest must reissue the court-ordered statement verbatim.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Starr, Filed On: August 7, 2023, Case #: 3:17cv2278, NOS: Railway Labor Act - Labor, Categories: Sanctions, Transportation, Employment Discrimination